The digital health vacuum: Why Ghana’s legal frameworks are unprepared for medical AI -Michael Mensah writes

Jun 13, 2026
A minimalist illustration of a stethoscope and AI symbol representing healthcare technology.

The integration of AI into Ghana's healthcare system raises critical legal and ethical questions regarding accountability and data protection, as highlighted by Valentine Golden Ghanem's insights.

In Ghana, the rapid adoption of AI-assisted diagnostic tools in healthcare presents a pressing issue: the lack of clear legal accountability when these technologies fail. As AI systems become more prevalent, the question of liability remains unresolved, particularly when misdiagnoses occur due to algorithmic errors. Ghanem emphasizes that existing laws do not adequately address the complexities introduced by AI in medical decision-making.

Ghanem, a medical scientist with extensive experience in healthcare, is pursuing advanced legal studies to bridge the gap between medicine and law. He identifies three critical vulnerabilities in Ghana's healthcare regulations: a lack of legal clarity on liability, insufficient data protection laws that fail to safeguard sensitive patient information, and the risks associated with using AI models trained on non-local datasets. These issues could lead to significant clinical risks if not addressed.

Instead of advocating for a halt in technological advancements, Ghanem calls for the establishment of a robust regulatory framework. This includes mandatory validation of foreign AI models with local data, tailored governance standards for health data, and explicit definitions of liability in cases of AI-related errors. He argues that without these measures, the integration of AI in healthcare could lead to more harm than benefit.

Read the original article: CitiNewsroom.com